Best Practices

Best Practices

prospect_wine_field

These guidelines are a synthesis of lessons for good practice from six case studies of grass-roots support for on-farm conservation in Eastern and Southern Africa.

This document first defines good practice, then lists ten key aspects of good practice, giving specific suggestions about how to handle each aspect, based on the lessons from the case study projects. Click here for further information on the field work and analytical methods used in this project.

What is “good practice”?
Good practice refers to what projects must provide, call down or ensure in order to support the sustainable maintenance and use of agricultural biodiversity.

One of the main lessons from the case studies is the need for an integrated approach, providing a range of incentives, and organisational development, as well as technical advice.

Providing what farmers want
Successful projects support on-farm conservation by providing services that farmers want. From the farmer scoring exercises in each case study, it is clear that above all else farmers value:

- Market channels (providing inputs, selling produce, obtaining services). Relying on traditional channels on their own is not sufficient.
- Additional knowledge on production techniques (eg Integrated Pest Management, organic production, quality production). Traditional techniques are not enough on their own, and may have been a factor in traditional farmers varieties falling into disuse (as was the case, for example, with durum wheat in the Ethiopian case study area, where traditional techniques were inadequate for combating rust)
- New crops to respond to new market opportunities, changing climatic conditions (especially shorter growing seasons), or to provide better nutrition and livelihoods
- Traditional varieties are valued for specific attributes: cheaper, more reliable access to seed and planting material (particularly relevant where there has been significant retrenchment of government service delivery); restoration of cultural heritage where traditional varieties have been lost in the past for whatever reason (conflict, drought, research and extension campaigns promoting modern varieties).

Providing incentives
There has to be an incentive for farmers to maintain and use agricultural biodiversity on-farm: the case studies found economic or market incentives were of most interest to farmers, whereas only a few get involved in on-farm conservation out of interest or as a hobby.

The incentives used in the case studies were: providing market channels, increasing yields, reducing costs, and prizes. We found different incentives have very different effects. Prizes encourage a few specialists, not wider uptake. The chance to sell seed, for example to community seed banks, was good for individual farmers (providing cash income) and good for the community as whole (increasing the local availability of seed). Projects need to be careful not to provide conflicting incentives. For example, one case study project ran a farmer-based seed multiplication scheme for modern varieties for a local seed company at the same time as holding seed fairs intended to promote the maintenance and use of traditional varieties: most farmers focussed on the income opportunities from the multiplication scheme, knowing that only a few of their neighbours would be successful in winning prizes at the seed fair.

Providing knowledge
In the farming systems studied, traditional production techniques are no longer enough, due to ecosystem changes (season length, new pests and diseases) and/or changes in production systems (especially increasing intensity of production) and livelihood needs (cash income for school fees, etc).

The starting point should be validation and building on existing farmer knowledge, but such an exercise may well reveal areas where it is relevant to introduce appropriate new techniques. In the case study projects, these included integrated pest management, organic production, quality-assured production. Fitting with existing culture is an advantage. For example, part of the success of the project in Ethiopia arose because it was introducing organic production techniques for durum wheat, a crop which has great religious significance.

Working with farmers – general principles
Establishing effective working relationships with farmers was a critical factor in determining the success of the different case study projects. Although this should be obvious, not all projects devoted sufficient time and resources to getting this right from the start. Key points include:

- Putting front-line staff in the project area on a long-term basis
- Dealing with potential problems of exclusion of key stakeholders by working with existing socio-cultural roles (for example, don’t expect women to attend distant training courses if it is culturally unacceptable for women to stay away from home overnight)
- Using project approaches that create an opportunity for farmers to meet together (to share information on prices, diseases, production techniques, etc), in contrast to for example Training & Visit type systems that use individual contact.

Working with farmers – using group approaches
Using group approaches was highly valued in the farmer scoring exercise for the reasons outlined above. In any case, few projects have the resources to work through individual contact. Whether the project works through existing groups (e.g. set up by previous projects or the state agricultural extension service), or new groups, does not appear to affect success (although using existing groups may be cheaper for the project), so long as:

- group interests coincide with project objectives
- projects spend time and resources on:

-group formation if necessary
- institutional capacity building

Institutional arrangements
Successful projects:

- had a project champion with a clear vision and capacity to make the project work, including the ability to mobilise stakeholders at all levels
- devoted time and resources to identifying and involving all relevant stakeholders, to ensure

- political will from government
- service delivery from relevant government or private sector institutions, where they exist (e.g. extension, quality standards)
- matching of interests with industry (because where the produce is of interest to processors or exporters, they may support the project by paying premium prices, providing transport or technical advice)

Funding chain
Successful projects:

- keep funding chains short (for example, the Kenyan project has disbursement officers stationed at District level)
- have autonomous, reliable, locally based resource managers. This can be difficult within government structures (unless there has been really effective decentralisation) which are by their nature bureaucratic – suited to regulation/control but less suited to service delivery.

Resource requirements
Total resource requirements, including those not fully costed within project structures or provided in kind by other institutions, are relatively high and include:

- Sufficient local staff
- A committed project champion operating at national level
- Service delivery by project or partner institutions (extension, quality control, etc)
- Transport for inputs and outputs

Some of the case study projects charged membership fees, levies, or consultancy fees to other agencies using project services, to reduce net costs. The extent that this is possible depends on the level and reliability of farmers’ benefits from the project, and the level of demand for project services (a full economic appraisal of the project is needed to ascertain this accurately).

Physical location
Our field work revealed that most of the case studies are located in areas of fertile soils. We did not measure how much this influenced project success, but we assume it is beneficial rather than harmful. Added to this, most of the case studies use IPM and/or organic approaches, which contribute to sustaining the soil.

Most of the case studies are in areas with poor roads infrastructure (although not necessarily geographically remote). On the one hand, this increased farmers’ interest in the project, as a means of getting on-the-spot access to inputs, outputs and advice. On the other hand, it increased project costs.

Sustainability
The ultimate goal of projects supporting on-farm conservation must surely be to contribute to the development or strengthening of systems for the maintenance and use of agricultural biodiversity on-farm which will be sustainable over the longer term. The experience of the case study projects suggests there are five key requirements for sustainability:

- The system must be popular with farmers – in most situations, this involves some form of economic incentive
- The system must be market-based (uses prices) not project-based (using prizes)
- The market on which the system is based must be reliable, not transient or greatly variable
- Over the long term, any regular funding required for conservation activities must come from channels that are permanent and accessible (eg marketing agreements with industry, membership fees/levies rather than donor funding)
- Over the long term, economic integration (roads, transport, market chains for inputs and outputs) must become the responsibility of permanent institutions not the project. In the case study projects, it is debatable whether this is feasible in the current economic climate.

 

Kenya Final.pdf

Data Analysis Workshop

Data Analysis Workshop

African-Farma

Addis Ababa, February 2003

A workshop was held in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, from 3rd to 7th February 2003 to synthesis and derive common lessons from all six case studies. The workshop was hosted by Ethio-Organic Seed Action (EOSA) at the Ras Amba Hotel, and opened by H.E. Ato Gebremedhin Belay, Vice Minister of Agriculture.

Six of the seven participants who conducted the field- and desk-based case studies managed to attend, together with Elizabeth Cromwell, project coordinator and Carlos Barahona project statistician. In addition John Young (ODI) joined the meeting to advise on communication issues and design the web-site, and Connie Almekinders attended as a biodiversity resource person on behalf of GTZ.

The initial task was to confirm that the case studies that were selected were in fact ‘successful’ in terms of having a positive impact on agro-biodiversity conservation. This was verified and to some extent quantified. The group then split into teams to extract critical information on common themes from each Case Study report. The synthesis reports from this exercise allowed both cross-cutting issues to be identified, as well as differences among projects to be highlighted. These were developed into initial draft ‘Best Practice Guidelines’ and ‘Policy Implications’ for the implementation of projects aimed at the sustainable conservation of on-farm agro-biodiversity for food and agriculture.

A Stakeholders meeting was held on the final day of the workshop. Here the initial findings from the Data Analysis Workshop were shared with seven stakeholders from government departments, NGOs as well as International organizations. Useful feedback was obtained from the stakeholders on the relevance of the findings in relation to their own experiences. Also, their views on the relevance of this project’s communication strategy were sought.

On the final afternoon, team members discussed the communication strategy, agreed responsibilities for producing proposed information products, and discussed the programme and participants for the final regional meeting.

In addition to the workshop. team members also enjoyed some traditional Ethiopian food, Ethiopian dancing and a field trip to an EOSA project site near Addis.

The project team would like to express their thanks to EOSA for all the logistical arrangements for the workshop, and to all the participants of the seminar for their invaluable advice.
Genetic_Diversity_and_On-farm_Seed_system_Ethiopia.ppt

Case Study

Case Study

africa farm

The East African Sub-Regional Pilot Project for Farmer Field Schools, Integrated Production and Pest Management (IPPM FFS)

 

The Farmer Field School (FFS) training method was first developed by the FAO-assisted Indonesian National IPM program in 1989. The concept behind an FFS is that groups of farmers meet on a regular basis to do practical learning that is based on a season-long curriculum. The learning combines local knowledge with scientific ecological approaches. All lessons are hands-on and field based with a few lectures on special topics. Farmers carry out experiments on study plots which they establish and manage as a group. In FFS the extensionist’s role changes from that of a primary knowledge source to that of the facilitator of a learning process.

The East African Sub-Regional Pilot Project for Farmer Field Schools started in 1999 in Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania with activities based in 8 pilot districts. The goals of the project were to:

- Expand the capacity of governments, NGOs and the private sector to respond to the knowledge and information needs of resource-poor farmers
- Reduce food insecurity and enhance sustainability of agricultural land use through farmers’ improved understanding and control of determinants of farm performance
- Increase the competence of extension systems to provide farmer education that responds effectively to local resources and conditions
- Establish a networking capacity for exchange of FFS experiences within and between countries
- Contribute information on the replicability and effectiveness of FFS as an alternative and sustainable extension method

The pilot project is administered as a regional project under the execution of the Global IPM facility of FAO in collaboration with national Ministries of Agriculture. The local area extension staff of the host government carries out FFS field based operations and receives overall guidance from the project assistant in each country. A regional co-ordinator from CAB International Africa Regional Centre provides technical backstopping to the project assistants.

A FFS is a group of 25 farmers who meet weekly through an entire growing season to learn through practical experience about integrated production and pest control. The groups are facilitated by both government extension staff and farmers. Following training each extension worker runs between 2 and 4 FFS in his duty area for one season. Farmers who graduate from the first FFS volunteer to facilitate new FFS in the neighbourhood with close guidance of the extension staff facilitator. Such FFS are referred to as farmer–run. To date there are over 1000 FFS within the project area (Kenya 481, Uganda 490 and Tanzania 167) with close to 25,000 beneficiaries. FFS focus on different crops in each country. In Tanzania FFS focuses on cooking bananas, cassava and vegetables (local and exotic); in Uganda on cotton, groundnuts, sunflower, cassava, vegetables (local and exotic), sweet potatoes and beans; and in Kenya on vegetables (local and exotic), maize, beans, sorghum, cassava and sweet potatoes. In all three countries, small livestock and HIV/AIDS have been included in the FFS curriculum.

A new financial model has been developed in which the FFS group receives a grant which it then uses to purchase learning materials and to reimburse transport cost and lunch to the staff facilitator. Self-financing groups can obtain a loan from a revolving fund, which it must subsequently return at the end of the season through funds raised from the field plots and through an educational fee.

 

In the FFS study fields farmers carry out different trials which include testing of different crop varieties. This has led farmers to diversify the number of crops they grow which includes both indigenous and exotic ones. The promotion of Integrated Pest Management (IPM) has enhanced the conservation of on-farm biodiversity and composting has enhanced soil life.

Benefits
Benefits of the FFS approach for the conservation and sustainable use of agricultural biodiversity include:

- Increased knowledge among farmers of farm ecology, decision-making, different varieties and different production systems,
- Better understanding of biological control measure, and increased use of non-chemical control measures
- Reduced level of pesticide usage and increased use of non chemical control measures,
- Increased use of manures and making of compost (40-80% farmers using manure).
- Between 20% and 100% increased yields on study plots and in farmers fields,
- Increased crop diversity,
- Enhanced group cohesiveness and better financial management and expenditure management within groups,
- Farmers empowered to seek solutions to their problems (e.g. farmers visiting ICRAF station to solicit technical advice).
- Farmers are recognised as leaders in the community,
- Farmer networks formed from the grassroots to district level, managed by farmers themselves leading to improved extension and farmer interactions and horizontal flow of information,
- Gender roles recognised and respected e.g. women allowed to freely air their views,
- The new ‘grant system’ and self-financing groups offers the potential for sustainability and expansion.

Challenges
The project has however encountered some bottlenecks along the way:

- Large project area and few extension staff who are unable to meet the demand,
- Large number of local dialects, spoken by few extension workers,
- The transformation of extension staff from instructors to facilitators is not easy,
- The FFS approach (working together through a single growing season) does not translate easily to perennial crops

Lessons
Lessons from this case study include:

- IPPM FFS are a useful method to promote agrobiodiversity conservation, and farmers who have been through a FFS can pass on their knowledge to others,
- The FFS approach helps build networks from village grassroots to district levels and between farmers’ and marketing organizations, opening up excellent avenues for information exchange between farmers and other stakeholders ranging from service providers to market access.
- FFS contribute to community development. FFS educated farmers are more confident in running their own and other community acticvities,
- The Self-Financing model, and farmer-facilitated FFS offer an excellent opportunity for scaling up

Martin Kimani & Abisai Mafa

The Reasons Why Mexican Labors Are Leaving Farming

Agriculture in the North America Traditionally has had an advantage, which was to hire labor from Mexico at very low prices. According to the national Agricultural Worker Survey (NAWS), approximately 70 percent of the farm workers in the United States are Mexico-born. All kinds of agricultural farms in the US have enjoyed an extended period of farm labors with low wages. However, new data tells that involvement of the Mexican labors in the US is decreasing and in the upcoming years, US farms will have to offer higher wages to the labors.

As they can have good incomes from other sectors, they prefer to get migrated into those sectors than the agriculture. Mexico’s per-capita income now exceeds $15,000 per year. Growth in the Mexico’s non-agricultural employment began before the recession and still persists. It is expected that the Mexican workforce will continue moving out of agriculture with the increasing opportunities of non-agricultural sectors.

Solution of the issue:

First solution is to seek workers from other countries with comparatively lower reservation wages. However, the situation of the US-Mexico is unique because two countries have vastly different levels of income and they surprisingly share a common border. The countries in the Central America are small compared to Mexico and they are changing. Importing labor into the US from more distant countries does not appear plausible.

Another effective solution is to invest in labor-saving technologies and transition away from labor-intensive crops. Under this scenario, the US farms will change their labor-management practices; which means they will hire fewer workers at higher wages. Rising farm wages creates and incentive for farmers to make necessary investments to raise farmworker productivity.

A Successful Water Conservation Project in India

Because of the conservation project at Bitkuli village in Chattisgarh, India, the village has turned into a model village. The village has a total population of approximately 250 people and scarcity was the daily companion to these people. Most of the people do farming to secure their lives, however, before the conservation project, there were few who could earn good profit.

Ashok Bhaskar’s family has been growing paddy here for so long, but in the last 4 years, they have managed to get financial benefit from farming. In 2008, an NGO, Shikhar Yuva Manch (SYM), started a water conservation project with Bhaskar and other villagers in Bitkuli and this project has changed their fate.

The earlier farmers here in Bitkuli were struggling so much to produce crop in only season because there was not abundant water. There is 255 acres of cultivate land, but they could grow just one crop in 130 acres due to the scarcity of the water. However, there is now water even in April; which is the result of the water conservation project.

There was once a time when people would go outside the village in searching other works, but those days are gone. Now people are doing farming as there is water throughout the entire year.

Earlier, the sole source of the irrigation was the Dharmasagar pond and no canal was built to supply sufficient water and even the water depth was not good. The villagers said we could somehow manage to bring the water from that pond, but sadly we could only irrigate few acres.

In 2008, SYM, decided to help the poor villagers of bitkuli. The reason why they select this village was because the villagers were poor, lacked resources and knowledge. The project has become successful and brought smiles on the face of the farmers.

Resource for farmers, new plan of the Environmental

An environmental organization Beef and Lamp New Zealand is working hard for the betterment of the farmers. They’ve successfully completed their project on providing various resources to the farmers and now they’re launching their refreshed version of Land and Environmental Planning Toolkit. This toolkit will help sheep and beef farmers to manage land and environmental issues of their farm.

The Minister for the Environment Hon Amy Adams will be the one to launch this toolkit at an event in Christchurch. From a long ago the farmers of New Zealand are taking good care of their farms. They’ve recognized the importance to take care of their farm for the environment. Most of the farmers are managing farms from generations. In New Zealand, the economic growth of most of the families and most importantly the whole countries depend on the betterment of the farming section.

Government has already supported the farmers with various resources to improve the farming sector. Initiative has been taken to raise the awareness among farmers. They’ve been educated with the important knowledge and information from the experts.

Most of the families know the importance of taking good care of the farm. They understand the need to maintain and improve the natural resources of their farms for future generations. This newly launched toolkit will help the farmers to identify which action will be required to improve production. It will help them to take good management of the land, soil and water resources.

Most often farmers need to take innovative steps to require their individual challenges. This newly launched toolkit will be a useful resource to the farmers for identifying their problems and to take exact initiative to solve it.

Initiative been taken to conserve farmland birds and Landscapes

For the conservation of farmland birds and enhance the landscape in a part of Teesdale a new project has been launched. The project aims to conserve the farmland birds naming Birds and Farm Landscapes Project. This three year project will concentrate working on Bernard Castle and the parishes of Eggleston, Gainford, Barmingham and Bowes. Jennie Stanford is an expert in this field. She has already worked with the former Tyne Tees Farming and Wildlife Advisory Group for around six years. She was appointed as the project officer for this Landscapes project.

As the starting, Jennie will conduct a survey on farmland conservation and plan small grants scheme. This project aims to improve habitat and feeding conditions for rare farmland birds. Lots of farmland birds like tree sparrows, grey partridge, yellow hammers and barn owls are facing extinction. This project was initialized for the conservation of these almost extinct species.

Farmers will be encouraged to create wild bird seed mix plots, hedgerow restoration and establishment with this grants scheme. They will also re-wild the field margins. The scheme also encourages farmers to mix wild bird with smaller seeds to benefit the smaller birds. Though the landscape and bird life is still attractive and fairy healthy but it’s been forgotten that these parts are the borders of outstanding natural beauty. She will work with the farmer and inspire them to restore the former glory of these areas.

Already a large number of farmers have shown their interest to work under this project. Tree planting has been begun at Gilmonby. Farmers who’ve put their interest they are communicating with the experts for the appropriate way to boosting this conservation. Hopefully, with the help of the expert team and hard work of farmers the glory will be restored and these areas will once again be the border of natural beauty.

Human Waste in Agriculture of Africa!

In recent years an innovative project of International Water Management Institute (IWMI) has started to boost the agriculture of Africa. Resource Recovery and Reuse team at the West Africa office of IWMI directly responsible for this project. This project is called ‘Fertilizer Pellet Fertilization Project’.

The goal of this project is to harness human waste and turn it into safe, hygienic fertilizer pellets, which will be safe and suitable for application by farmers. If the formula clicks, this fertilizer will help farmers to develop the organic content and nutrient levels of their poor soils, which in turn can improve the water bearing capacity and crop yields of their cultivating lands.

The raw materials of this project consists a mixture of human waste and other natural products such as organic food scraps and sawdust. By simultaneously turning and resting the mixture, create a natural heat treatment during the composting process that will assist in removing pathogens while minimizing nutrient losses.

‘Fertilizer Pellet Fertilization Project’ isn’t a new concept. For centuries, it has been used effectively in Asia. But it is comparatively new for sub-Saharan Africa; adding organic waste to the soil makes sense in a region particularly vulnerable to climate variability and changes. Rainfall may become far more unusual. Providing smallholder farmers with support to improve water and soil management will be a key strategy to increase their resilience to adverse climatic conditions and hence minimizing poverty in a changing climate.

“Unlike animal manure or farm residue traditionally, the use of human manure in agriculture has been met with some opposition in sub-Saharan Africa,” says Nikiema. “However, this was more at the regulatory level than at the farmer’s end. Farmers appreciate the material.” And Nikiema understands that cultural resistance on using human waste in producing foods is a confounding factor that needs to be addressed.

Get together your gear and start farming

Small farming has become one of the top supportive ways for the national annual economy. Lots of people are getting interested day by day. If you are one of them and thinking to become a small farmer? Then you need to know some facts for sure and I am here to give you some advises that may help you in the future.

First you have to decide where you’ll start and once you have took that decision of where you will be farming, must contact the other farmers in that area. It’ll save lot of your pressure and you can learn the soil condition, climate, crop verities and more from them. And most importantly, they may give you some secrets of farming for that area.

You’ll learn farming step by step, as it says farming has a long learning curve. You have got advices from local farmers and read all the books of farming so what’s to worry? You’ll be proved wrong and it will take some time to be a successful farmer. For farming, you need to be patient for sure.

Start right now as you have made your final decision to become a farmer. Don’t lose your patience if it takes plenty of time to be a master in this area. If you don’t have enough land for farming right now then start at your balcony with a container. You can experiment with an easy-to-grow crop.

You have to do research on farming, only then you might have known how important soil and climate conditions, and water resources are. It’s wise to go with a particular crop and grow it. Research on the land and analyze which crops can be suitable for the land.

Farming needs great responsibility. If you and corresponding personals are responsible enough then you can make success in farming.

Light of Hope in African Agriculture

African agricultural sector is improving day by day. African Green Revolution Forum (AGRF) is working hard on the development and overall growth in African agricultural sector. AGRF believes private sector investment and support can lead the growth to higher points and they are working as global platform for agricultural productivity and income growth for African Nations.

If the African governments become more helpful and take proper initiative they can gain more success. On a forum meeting AGRF Chairman Dr. Kofi Annan underscored the current progress and urges to extend the helping hand of government personals in this sector.

AGRF is currently working on improvement of smallholder farmers who barely can waver. Women play the important part in maintaining the whole family. They’re care for land and productive nature is the reason behind for present success. But most of them don’t have any expert knowledge or experience. If they can’t find proper support this success won’t long last.

Most of the African people lives below standard income line. Proper utilization of their resource might change the scenario. But for that they need to be expert in productivity. Smallholder farmers can play important role in country’s economy. For that government should support them with knowledge and resources.

To boost up the agricultural growth and supply possible resources AGRF and Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency has announced $10 million support. Government should wisely plan the next step and use it for the best output. Smallholder farmers are eagerly waiting for the next step and ready to attend technical workshop to improve their quality and productivity.

Government should immediately launch special propaganda to keep up this performance. More and more personal should get involved in agricultural sector with a motto to product. Hopefully present situation will change and stable income growth will be obtained.

Methodologies for On Farm Conservation

On farm conservation protects threatened plants in their natural habitats and takes into account social and cultural factors such as farmers’ knowledge. It plays an important role to enable plants to continue to evolve and adapt with the changing conditions. In biological word it means the conservation of genetic diversity of traditional crops in the surroundings where they have developed their distinctive properties in traditional farming systems.

On farm conservation involve the maintenance of genetic diversity in the locations where it is encountered in situ. It is the sustainable management of genetic diversity of locally developed crop varieties by farmers within traditional agricultural, horticultural or agri – silvicultural systems. It involves the maintenance of traditional crop varieties or cropping systems by farmers within traditional agricultural systems.

The conservation of cultivated forms, actual varieties, old cultivars and landraces in the production process is included in on farm conservation, which is a dynamic conservation form, because it’s referring to a continuity of evolution process.

On farm conservation has triple dynamics – environmental factors include climate, edaphic, biotic and global changes, economic factors and social factors. It involves lots of simple activates which depends on the species concerned and their characteristics, distribution, genetic variation, habitats, economic importance, the degree of threat and the resource available.

In on farm conservation either the focus is the conservation of genetic diversity within a particular farming system or is the conservation of the traditional farming system. Dispute the great importance and usability of this method the matter of regret is that there have been only a few attempts to scientifically study on farm conservation and most of the time farmer undertake the conservation not scientists which should have been the other way.

Program Launched in Guelph to Conserve Endangered Species

In Guelph area several species are at risk includes birds, amphibians, mammals, plants and insects. Farmers have been summoned in order to protect these species. Species at Risk Farm Incentive Program is taking this initiative for the fifth time in five years. They will provide 50 percent of the funding to farmers who wants to take part in this campaign and help to save these threatened species. Ontario Soil and Crop Improvement Association in Guelph will administrate the whole program.

For this year, they have raised around $900000 to support the cause. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources funds the most of it. Interested farmers will submit their project and can receive up to $20000. Every year 130-150 projects run under this program. To safeguard biodiversity and protect species at risk this program has been proven effective from the beginning.

According to Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, almost 30,000 species of animals and plants are in this area. Pollution, habitat loss, spread of invasive species and changing land use activities are the main reasons for the threat of existence of these plants and animals. Every year lots of interested farmers take part in this program aimed to save the endanger species and so far the program is pleasantly successful.

Among various endangered species Jefferson salamander, Barn Owl, Acadian Flycatcher, Louisiana Waterthrush, Black Tern, Snapping Turtle, Mountain Lion/Cougar, Milk Snake, Grey Fox, American Chestnut, Pygmy Pocket Moss and Kentucky Coffee are remarkable. Along with Ontario Soil and Crop Improvement Association wildlife organizations, academics, conservation groups and governments are working side-by-side in this campaign. The campaign started with the goal to manage good practices both for farming and endangered species. Like previous years, organizers are expecting huge participation from farmers and work with them in smart projects.

We Need to Balance Our Water Resources in Agriculture

All lives on the earth are dependent on water and this is what we use abundantly in our daily lives. We always expect the world to be a perfect world where none will suffer and everyone would be happy. But in order to live a happy life, we need to maintain a natural equilibrium which most us don’t even think. We need adequate pure water to produce our foods; however, most of us don’t have a good idea about water-balancing.

That equilibrium has become difficult to maintain in these days and it will become more difficult with the growing population and increasing demands. Brian Hurd from New Mexico University said that all of we have to be aware of this and proper water-balancing will require an unprecedented cooperation. According to Hurd, we cannot balance it unless we can weigh.

In agriculture, the users must determine how much water it will need to produce an acre of crop. Opportunity costs also have to be determined. They have to indentify the total economic value of water. The total economic value is indeed a powerful concept. We will be able to make good decision by recognizing the resource value.

We will have to use more efficient and effective water use methods. In near future, it may be possible to transfer water to the other users during the time of drought.

The city is trying to balance the demand and supply of water. However, the demands and supply of water greatly depend on the climate and weather. A warmer climate great affects water demand and supply. Temperature affects downstream users because high temperature reduces runoff.

Agriculture must do a great job in using of water in food production. Water is a renewable source so all we need to address these issues technically and effectively.